There the ethics are as "Ethics of Being". Yoshimoto (Takaaki) tells that the understanding point of the turn is, to fully realize equivalentness of each being, putting it another way, that one and another have the same riddle and experienced the same suffering. Therefore he advocades the naming of the new understanding from the events above, "Ethics of Being". It sounds to me as a suggestion that, any human have their own origin of coordinates, where if one is able to return to it has the one make out the emotional ties. ("As to Ethics of Being" Norihiro Kato editing and writing "Murakami Haruki Yellow page PART2" "chapter.5 "Kafka on the shore"" pp.179-180 Arechi Shuppan-sha, 2004)
Taking this thing into account, the next scene read tender.
"Why does Maruo want to eat meals with the all families? Each may eat whenever one chose. No need to see each other. Leave me alone and I'll do irresponsibly." (pp.170)(this part may be not tough and solid in attitude and theory. think again and polish or change a little or.)
And Shiro comes to think that there is a meaning (or point) of life. "Middle of Nowhere" in him reaches "Middle of Somewhere". This partly can be assumed as homage for the famous last scene of "Norwegian Wood".
(Haruki Murakami is now a very very difficult writer and person to tell. One thing I think is, his novel is not bad or sometimes good in a whole except his style. And the second I think is, the scene where the young Hoshino was told, I was disappointed by definition, for example at the way in which action movies were treated, or games like Pachinko.)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿